🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Costly

Based on a recent study, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $17,000 for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes over tax credits that experts say could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would require payments from workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee earning average wages must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you compare it to what average US resident spends. I know multiple clients that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When you add those costs versus our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's military, technology, social programs and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would render administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complex (and ineffective) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and less expensive approach for not only managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this current situation could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.